I have chosen the 'madness or genius' article. Natural sciences are theories that have been proved. However, the variation of natural science in this article has become very experimental. It seems like humans are increasingly using experiments, but in this case, ‘gruesome’ experiments, to test out new theories that we don't really need to find.
These experiments are really not necessary. It is a damage to lives, taking away rights and very gruesome. A dog should not be modified in any way so that experiments can be carried out.
Who wants drink vomit just to find out whether a disease is contagious or not, unless they are some sort of a study freak of human disease, but otherwise it is very unsuitable, it is sick to me, even though I am just reading this off a piece of paper.
Imagine you are one of the soldiers on that plane trying to fill in an insurance policy form as if it really was happening just seconds before your death, and later told it was just a test? How mean is that? Honestly, I think people should not study how these soldiers, no matter how desperate they are.
It is an absolute abuse. This is not natural science in any measure of our imagination. It is not logical to conduct these tests, it doesn't necessarily help if we do, and through our senses we know they are also morally wrong. The person or animal that ate being were being tested weren't told beforehand.
I think it is never appropriate to be tested on without being told or without consent. It isn't even natural science.
1 comment:
1. "to test out new theories that we don't really need to find"
Some of the given experiments were needed to be conducted, in order to pave ways for new studies and/or save lives.
2."A dog should not be modified in any way so that experiments can be carried out."
Who are you to decide? What if operating experimentally on a dog(s) will save thousands of human lives or even lives of canines.
3."Who wants drink vomit ... unless they are some sort of a study freak of human disease"
Stubbins Ffirth did. Aside from not being a "study freak", he was a Doctor of Medicine, that provided breakthroughs on 'Yellow Fever' research. In addition, it was he who chose to conduct those experiments on himself, no one else, but perhaps it could be considered selfish of him to his family and friends if anything had happened to him.
4."it is sick to me, even though I am just reading this off a piece of paper."
There are many that conform to the standard of people that are "sick". What you find sick, may not be sick at all or seen as sick by other people.
5."Honestly, I think people should not study how these soldiers, no matter how desperate they are. It is an absolute abuse"
Can perhaps be justified for the greater food.
6."it is not logical to conduct these tests"
Of course it is logical, the experiments were conducted to discover the unknown whether to benefit in anyway.
Post a Comment