In the Scene, Juliet stands on her balcony talking to herself. Then Romeo comes along, hiding listening to what she is saying. Juliet loves Romeo, but because of their family issues they cannot be together. Juliet thinks family name is not important, and Romeo could be called anything but still be the Romeo she loves.
When Juliet said "What's in a name? that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet" I think she means no matter what name we give something it would still be the thing that it originally is. Rose is just a code name we give for a flower, and we relate to that "name"to the object as though they are one. When the name does not really matter of what the thing is. So what is the purpose of a name? Do we turn to someone else with another name?
Also, I cannot imagine people speaking like how Romeo and Juliet did in real life. Ignoring how they use metaphors frequently and how emotional they would get. Maybe this is because the age of the play, maybe they did speak like this at Shakespeare's age. But the english language sure had evolved. As I had still remember, someone telling me the word "Silly" meant serious instead of the meaning we have nowadays, which is quite a big difference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I agree with your opininon on how the english language has evolved. Your example of the word "silly" is very interesting this prooving how the meaning and importance of words differs for different people. Although i don't quite understand when you mention how a "Rose is just a code name"
Post a Comment